Telling and Trusting: Reductionism andAnti- Reductionism in the Epistemology of Testimony
نویسندگان
چکیده
Tony Coady's book Testimony is about how we gain knowledge from other people, through learning from their spoken and written reports and other tellings. Several major philosophers, including John Locke, David Hume, Thomas Reid, and Bertrand Russell, have written more briefly on "testimony" in this broad sense (Coady's historical chapters provide us with helpful critical accounts of their views), but this is the first booklength study devoted to the subject. The appearance of such a study is welcome, indeed long overdue: as Coady tells us, with much justice, "testimony is a prominent and underexplored epistemological landscape". The first forays into that terrain made in Testimony yield many important insights. Coady has been pondering the role of testimony in our lives for many years, and this study shows deep and considered thought. It is rich in detailed insights on many matters, and it flows from a firm and firmly held conception of the centrality of testimony, as a source within our structure of empirical knowledge, which has grown on Coady over the years.
منابع مشابه
Aspects of reductionism in religious studies
Reductionism is a major methodological mistake in research and generally in thought; because it can pose as an obstacle to comprehensive views about the researched issue. This issue is more tangible in religious phenomena - due to the multidimensional entity of this subject – and can be more destructive. A researcher through focusing on one role and aspect of religion and concentrating on a ...
متن کاملIn defense of non-reductionism in the epistemology of testimony
Almost everyone agrees that many testimonial beliefs constitute knowledge. According to non-reductionists, some testimonial beliefs possess positive epistemic status independent of that conferred by perception, memory, and induction. Recently, Jennifer Lackey has provided a counterexample to a popular version of this view. Here I argue that her counterexample fails.
متن کاملIndefensible Middle Ground for Local Reductionism about Testimony
Local reductionism purports to defend a middle ground in the debate about the epistemic status of testimony-based beliefs. It does so by acknowledging the practical ineliminability of testimony as a source of knowledge, while insisting that such an acknowledgment need not entail a default-acceptance view, according to which there exists an irreducible warrant for accepting testimony. The presen...
متن کاملA Defense of Reductionism about Testimonial Justification of Beliefs
This paper defends reductionism about testimonial justification of beliefs against two influential arguments. One is the empirical argument to the effect that the reductionist justification of our trust in testimony is either circular since it relies on testimonial evidence or else there is scarce evidence in support of our trust in testimony. The other is the transcendental argument to the eff...
متن کاملA Defence of Quasi-reductionism in the Epistemology of Testimony
Two key intuitions regarding knowledge are explored: that knowledge is a kind of cognitive achievement and tha t knowledge excludes luck. It is claimed that a proper understanding of how these intuitions should inform our conception of knowledge leads to some surprising results, not just as regards the theory of knowledge more generally but also as regards the epistemology of testimonial knowle...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2005